Randomtrain question

[David Relson]

At 11:02 AM 5/19/03, Jake Di Toro wrote:


>I'll save you from repeating my previous observations on my run, but I
>figured I'd try to get this question answered.
>
>Is randomtrain not capable of working with the tri-state filtering?  I
>would think that when asking for specific training that an unsure
>would not be suficient to classify messages as passing the spam/ham
>testing.

Randomtrain knows whether the message is ham/spam and checks bogofilter's 
result.  A mis-match calls for training.

Since "unsure" matches neither ham nor spam, any message classified as 
"unsure" is (by definition) incorrectly classified.

I think you _can_ use it with tri-state, but there's no value in doing that.