comments from a new user
David Relson
relson at osagesoftware.com
Sat May 10 13:13:31 CEST 2003
At 03:34 AM 5/10/03, Peter Bishop wrote:
>On 9 May 2003 at 23:13, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
>
> > > Consider a token with a pgood score of 0.1. That means it appears in
> 10%
> > > of the good messages that have been registered. Given that there are a
> > > gazillion other messages in the world, your statement isn't quite right.
> >
> > True, but I would think that anyone even roughly familiar with how
> > bogofilter works would understand that these numbers are based on
> > the messages that have been registered.
> >
> > > Perhaps you can suggest a different wording ...
> >
> > "the likelihood (extrapolated from your registered non-spam
> > messages) that a non-spam message contains this token"
> >
>
> "The proportion of good messages that contained this token"
Peter,
This is what I've been looking for - clean and simple. The official FAQ on
SourceForge has been updated.
Thank you.
David
>"proportion" is simply that - it does not claim anything about the
>probability of future messages containing the token.
>
>I think it is obvious from the context that we are talking about messages
>registered in the database.
>--
>Peter Bishop
>Adelard and Centre for Software Reliability, City University
>Drysdale Building, 10 Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB
>Tel: +44-20-7490-9467, Fax: +44-20-7490-9451
>pgb at adelard.com, http://www.adelard.com/
>pgb at csr.city.ac.uk, http://www.city.ac.uk/
More information about the Bogofilter
mailing list