Making your Spam mail box easier to check for Ham...

[Jake Di Toro]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 08:49:39PM +0100, Jonathan Hunt wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> I was thinking about how I could make checking my Spam mail box for Ham
> a little quicker today, and thought it would be nice if I could see
> the Spam scores for the messages without having to read each one.
> 
> My first thought was that I'd have get the score added to the
> message subject, but I couldn't think of a way to do it easily.
> Instead, I noticed that Mutt (the mailer I use to check my spam)
> can be configured to display a general purpose mail header
> called X-Label.

Since you're using procmail anyway......

:0 fw
| <bogofilter call here>

:0
* ^X-Bogosity: Yes
{

   :0
   * ^X-Bogosity:(.*\<)spamicity=\/[0-9\.]*
   SPAMICITY=$MATCH

   :0 f
   * ^Subject:\/.*
   | formail -I "Subject: $SPAMISITY $MATCH"

   :0:
   <spamfolder>
}

This is untested, and could probally use a tweak or two... but the
general idea is there.  This gives the added benifit of not being tied
to mutt, although this method could be a bterr solution for you than a
sed script as well, even for the X-Label header.

-- 
Till Later, Jake <karrde+bogofilter at viluppo.net>
-----------------------------------------------
Direct replys are likley to be flagged as spam.
Drop the +addy if you need to reply direct.