Chained token support?

[Villalovos, John L]

Thanks for the info.

>From reading the paper it sounded like it does seem to increase the
accuracy of the spam detection by having chained tokens/word pairs.

John

John Villalovos
Intel Corporation 
15400 NW GREENBRIER PKWY # CO5-162
BEAVERTON, OR  97006-5723
(503) 677-5777   Fax: (503) 677-6670

GPG 1.+/PGP 5.+/ DSS/Diffie Helman
http://www.sodarock.com/JohnVillalovos-gpgkey.txt
1024D/1A25D86C 2F24 AD89 E5D5 C92B 7FE2  F878 7ED5 2D38 1A25 D86C

My opinions are my own and NEVER the opinions of Intel Corporation.  I
am but a tiny, insignificant, infinitesimal (1/80000) cog in the giant
machine of Intel :)  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Bishop [mailto:pgb at adelard.com] 
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:56 AM
> To: bogofilter
> Subject: Re: Chained token support?
> 
> 
> On 13 Jun 2003 at 10:27, Villalovos, John L wrote:
> 
> > Does anyone know if Bogofilter supports or will support "chained
> > tokens"?
> > 
> 
> Not currently, but there was a lively discussion a month or two ago
> about storing "word pairs" which are effectively the same thing.
> 
> But we decided to defer looking at this until after he release of 
> bogofilter 1.0
> 
> -- 
> Peter Bishop 
> pgb at adelard.com
> pgb at csr.city.ac.uk
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> FAQ: http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/bogofilter-faq.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bogofilter-unsubscribe at aotto.com
> For summary digest subscription: bogofilter-digest-subscribe at aotto.com
> For more commands, e-mail: bogofilter-help at aotto.com
>