Bug in tuning.sh?
Greg Louis
glouis at dynamicro.on.ca
Fri Jun 13 12:50:54 CEST 2003
On 20030613 (Fri) at 1019:46 +0200, Boris 'pi' Piwinger wrote:
> Greg Louis wrote:
>
> > The purpose of getco is to get the cutoff required for a given target
> > number of false positives. The way it works is
> >
> > Evaluate the nonspams with a cutoff of 0.10 so that most will be
> > treated as spam.
> >
> > Sort the differences of those scores from 1 (which is how they are
> > printed by bogofilter).
> >
> > Take the score that is $target values down from the top of that list;
> > if it's less than 0.000001, move down the list till we find one that
> > isn't.
> >
> > Subtract that from 1 and return it as the cutoff to use when evaluating
> > spam.
>
> OK, but if this is how it works, why is 0.1 given to the
> function as a parameter. It should be a constant defined in
> the function.
>
Agreed.
--
| G r e g L o u i s | gpg public key: finger |
| http://www.bgl.nu/~glouis | glouis at consultronics.com |
| http://wecanstopspam.org in signatures fights junk email |
More information about the Bogofilter
mailing list