Bug in tuning.sh?

[Boris 'pi' Piwinger]

Greg Louis wrote:

> Try this:
> 
> --- tuning.sh.orig	2003-06-12 12:45:04.000000000 -0400
> +++ tuning.sh	2003-06-12 12:54:59.000000000 -0400

Now here is the result:

> Top 10 results
> 06/13 11:24:55 1e-1   0.475 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.499000, run0..  21  run1..  21  run2..  25   67
> 06/13 10:57:34 1      0.450 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  42  run1..  38  run2..  47  127
> 06/13 10:58:20 1      0.475 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  41  run1..  38  run2..  47  126
> 06/13 11:11:45 3.2e-1 0.450 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  42  run1..  38  run2..  47  127
> 06/13 11:12:25 3.2e-1 0.475 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  41  run1..  38  run2..  47  126
> 06/13 11:24:15 1e-1   0.450 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  42  run1..  38  run2..  47  127
> 06/13 11:36:44 3.2e-2 0.450 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  42  run1..  38  run2..  47  127
> 06/13 11:37:23 3.2e-2 0.475 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  41  run1..  38  run2..  47  126
> 06/13 11:49:15 1e-2   0.450 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  42  run1..  38  run2..  47  127
> 06/13 11:49:54 1e-2   0.475 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  41  run1..  38  run2..  47  126

Again, I don't believe those results:

1) Why do all have 8 false positives? That is a lot. Where
is this chosen (getco, right?), why?

2) Again, no significance to robs:
> 06/13 10:57:34 1      0.450 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  42  run1..  38  run2..  47  127
> 06/13 11:11:45 3.2e-1 0.450 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  42  run1..  38  run2..  47  127
> 06/13 11:24:15 1e-1   0.450 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  42  run1..  38  run2..  47  127
> 06/13 11:36:44 3.2e-2 0.450 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  42  run1..  38  run2..  47  127
> 06/13 11:49:15 1e-2   0.450 fpos.. 8 at cutoff 0.500000, run0..  42  run1..  38  run2..  47  127

What is BTW the reason for making these three runs all the
time instead of just one bigger one?

pi