Understanding tuning results

[Boris 'pi' Piwinger]

David Relson wrote:

> As mentioned above, it looks like the "Top 10" section is showing the worst 
> results (rather than the best).  Look in the results file for the lowest 
> value in the last column and try that for your test.

That is even more absurd now. There are several of those
lines with identical results:

> 06/05 14:59:51 1      0.475 fpos...0 at cutoff 0.503000, run0... 62  run1... 66  run2... 78  206
> 06/05 15:13:54 3.2e-1 0.475 fpos...0 at cutoff 0.503000, run0... 62  run1... 66  run2... 78  206
> 06/05 15:28:38 1e-1   0.475 fpos...0 at cutoff 0.503000, run0... 62  run1... 66  run2... 78  206
> 06/05 15:43:10 3.2e-2 0.475 fpos...0 at cutoff 0.503000, run0... 62  run1... 66  run2... 78  206
> 06/05 15:55:58 1e-2   0.475 fpos...0 at cutoff 0.503000, run0... 62  run1... 66  run2... 78  206

That suggests that robs is without any meaning. I doubt it.
There is something really broken.

pi