New database format

[Stephen Davies]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sorry David, I should have included that in the first place.

I am running a roll-your-own Linux on an Intel box. Kernel 2.4.20. GCC 2.95.2.

I tried your suggestion of removing -O2 from the C flags and the tests all 
passed.

I can easily live with an unoptimised bogoutil.

The doco for bogoupgrade does not mention a merge capability. I shall give it 
a try asap.

Cheers and thanks for your help (and software),
Stephen Davies

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:58 pm, David Relson wrote:
> At 10:56 PM 7/24/03, Stephen Davies wrote:
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >G'day.
> >
> >I have downloaded 0.14.0.1 but cannot see any information on migrating
> > from the old, split database to the new unified format.
> >
> >I could rebuild the ham part from scratch but do not have a saved spam
> >collection.
> >
> >Is there any way to merge the existing bases?
> >
> >Also, make check failed the bogoutil tests with 0.14.0.1 (segfault
> >errors). Is
> >this a real issue? (All other automatic tests passed and manual bogoutil
> >tests seem to work)
> >
> >Cheers and thanks,
> >Stephe Davies
>
> Stephen,
>
> What operating system and architecture are you running on?  Thanks to
> debian, we know that bogofitler works on many architectures but not
> all.  If you can supply more detail, I'd be glad to work with you to learn
> what's happening in_your_ environment.
>
> David

- -- 
========================================================================
Stephen Davies Consulting P/L				                      Voice: 08-8177 1595
Adelaide, South Australia.				                           Fax  : 08-8177 0133
Computing & Network solutions.				                       Mobile:040 304 0583
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/IL/XoDUKE+nEPMQRAhsXAKC3DL4lIsrYkPU/4ixZ7u79WYVyqgCg5RGC
H/H850VZ2LvixfMpLnBs+Uc=
=6Qjh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----