Compilation problem with bogofilter-0.10.1.3 - tests still fail.

[Nick Simicich]

At 11:53 AM 2003-01-31 +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:

>On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Nick Simicich wrote:
>
> > Fails to compile:
> >
> > In file included from globals.c:13:
> > system.h:73: parse error before `uint32_t'
> > system.h:73: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
> > Makes the compilation work.  Something wrong with the way you arrived at
> > that, I think.
>
>The problem is we didn't include sys/types.h before using u_int32_t,
>that cannot work.
>
>Please try this patch on the pristine tarball, it should help your
>system compile without manual intervention.

The patch now works.  I re-extracted system.h, applied the patch, did a 
make, things are making fine now.


>If the tests still fail with the patch below, then please run the failed
>tests manually like this:

I have no reason to believe that they will work, since the actual generated 
code will almost certainly be the same (4 unsigned bytes == uint32_t).


>: >typescript
>script
>cd tests/bogofilter
>./t.lexer.mbx -v
>./t.robx -v
>exit
>
>If you don't have "script", use some other means to redirect the output
>of the two tests.
>
>Then tar/gzip the resulting output directory and the typescript file and
>tell us where we can pull it (FTP, HTTP) or send it to me and David
>privately.

The entire directory is available as individual files as:

http://majordomo.squawk.com/njs/bogofilter.cvs/

The typescript is:

http://majordomo.squawk.com/njs/bogofilter.cvs/typescript

I did a make check,
the two commands you asked for,
and the same commands with sh -v

http://majordomo.squawk.com/njs/bogofilter.cvs/bogofilter.whoops.tgz

is the whole tarball.

--
SPAM: Trademark for spiced, chopped ham manufactured by Hormel.
spam: Unsolicited, Bulk E-mail, where e-mail can be interpreted generally 
to mean electronic messages designed to be read by an individual, and it 
can include Usenet, SMS, AIM, etc.  But if it is not all three of 
Unsolicited, Bulk, and E-mail, it simply is not spam. Misusing the term 
plays into the hands of the spammers, since it causes confusion, and 
spammers thrive on  confusion. Spam is not speech, it is an action, like 
theft, or vandalism. If you were not confused, would you patronize a spammer?
Nick Simicich - njs at scifi.squawk.com - http://scifi.squawk.com/njs.html
Stop by and light up the world!