autodaemon [was: mailbox classificataion]

[David Relson]

At 02:04 PM 1/30/03, Clint Adams wrote:

> > I used not to trust bogofilter to process whole mboxen with -s or -n.
> > Then I found that it did in fact work ok, and was more than 5 times
> > faster than processing the same mbox with formail -s bogofilter.  That
> > is a lot of convenience to throw away, so yes, I'd object strongly to
> > doing so.
>
>I imagine that if the autodaemon stuff were revived and fixed, this
>wouldn't be an issue.

Clint,

I've been thinking about autodaemon as well.  Back in September, I didn't 
know how bogofilter was supposed to work and adding autodaemon into the 
picture made it totally unmanageable for me.  Now, at least, I understand 
bogofilter sans autodaemon.  I think of autodaemon once in a 
while.  Perhaps in the next few weeks I'll find time to look at it and get 
it working.

David