Accuracy is lacking

[Nick Simicich]

At 08:30 AM 2003-02-14 -0500, David Relson wrote:

>It'll be amusing to see what score bogofilter gives to _this_ message 
>(given its mix of ham and spam subjects).

X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.128178, version=0.10.2

My guess is that you are right, and that the numbers vary from person to 
person. But one big change for me was when bodies were parsed, and I got 
another shift when I repaired my databases - I believe that there were 
things happening in the broken databases that I simply did not 
understand.  Just as a side comment, I reorganized my databases again today 
and the databases properly verified and properly dumped and restored.

--
Take The Boulder Pledge Today
"Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything offered to me as the 
result of an unsolicited e-mail message. Nor will I forward chain letters, 
petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large numbers of others. 
This is my contribution to the survival of the online community."  - Roger 
Ebert -- nor will I vote for any candidate who solicits my vote via e-mail.
Nick Simicich - njs at scifi.squawk.com