Radical lexers

[Boris 'pi' Piwinger]

michael at optusnet.com.au wrote:

>> >on a very easy data set. 
>> 
>> Why do you think so?
>
>It looks like you're taking all the ham and spam from a single
>mailbox.
>
>This changes the classification task from 'find that spam'
>to just "find things that don't looks like my normal
>email".

While this is correct, I get mail for many people (looking
at the volume;-). But more interesting I receive mail for
totally different areas including legitimate mail with lots
of "spammish" words (e.g. I maintain the FAQ for
de.talk.liebesakt, something like the German version of
alt.sex).

pi