DG/UX

[Matthias Andree]

David Relson <relson at osagesoftware.com> writes:

> +#ifdef	__DGUX__
> +/* Compare S1 and S2, ignoring case.  */
> +extern int strcasecmp (__const char *__s1, __const char *__s2);
> +

Why the double underscore? We don't want these, quoting the manual
"(autoconf.info)C Compiler":

 - Macro: AC_C_CONST
     If the C compiler does not fully support the ANSI C qualifier
     `const', define `const' to be empty.  Some C compilers that do not
     define `__STDC__' do support `const'; some compilers that define
     `__STDC__' do not completely support `const'.  Programs can simply
     use `const' as if every C compiler supported it; for those that
     don't, the `Makefile' or configuration header file will define it
     as empty.

> --- Makefile~	2003-12-10 18:49:41.000000000 -0500
> +++ Makefile	2003-12-11 17:03:40.000000000 -0500
> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@
>  EXE_EXT = 
>  GSL_CFLAGS = -I/usr/include
>  GSL_CONFIG = /usr/bin/gsl-config
> -GSL_LIBS = -L/usr/lib -lgsl -lgslcblas -lm
> +GSL_LIBS = -L/usr/lib -lgsl -lgslcblas -lm -ldgc

These aren't our problem. If some system chooses to provide
implementations but no declarations, its users are on their own. It will
complain and work nonetheless, why bother. The .L_E123 issue is
serious, and I have no other idea than to request "nm" information.

-- 
Matthias Andree

Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95