Bogofilter and reclassifying

[Stroller]

On Dec 5, 2003, at 12:59 pm, David Relson wrote:
>
> I took a quick look at your script and it looks fine.  It's nicely
> readable and looks like it should work.  Good job.

Thanks! It's my first real Bash script.   8-]

I fooled with a the `find` command a little whilst implementing it, and 
was interested to discover that the `find ... -print0 | xargs -0 
bogofilter -B` method I used (or rathr, was advised to use!) was 
*twenty times faster* than `-exec bogofilter -I

> I did find a couple of details that you might want to change.  First,
> "-W" isn't needed as that's bogofilter's default mode....
> Lastly, the "exit 0" statements are unnecessary as they're
> in places where nothing more happens in the script.  If they're 
> deleted,
> the code will just fall through to the end of the script and exit
> normally.

This is sorta characteristic of my programming style - I'll often tend 
to write things in my code which may be a little bit redundant, but 
which may make it a little more human-readable. So, if nothing else, 
the exit 0 (which I think is correct for a script which has executed 
cleanly?) tells anyone wishing to modify it that that's where the 
script is supposed to end. Calling something explicitly in its default 
mode saves anyone


>  Second, since
> bogofilter doesn't presently care whether its running with combined or
> separate wordlists, those checks aren't necessary.  Of course the
> separate wordlist code is scheduled to be deprecated in 0.16.0 and
> removed in 0.17.0 so using a single, combined wordlist is the right
> thing to do.