training to exhaustion and the risk of overvaluing irrelevant tokens

[Matthias Andree]

Boris 'pi' Piwinger <3.14 at logic.univie.ac.at> writes:

> But the problem described above is independend of this
> double-training. It (overvaluing irrelevant tokens) can
> happen with or without double training, just by the choice
> of messages to train with. But as I argue above there are
> less problems to expect because of the repeated training as
> compared to just one run.

Well, if you recieved a spam message, i. e. a bag of tokens, twice, then
registering it twice is the right thing to do, isn't it?

-- 
Matthias Andree