better Bayesian bogofilter

[Matthias Andree]

Boris 'pi' Piwinger <3.14 at logic.univie.ac.at> writes:

> Greg Louis <glouis at dynamicro.on.ca> wrote:
>
>>Conclusion
>>
>>The suggestions presented above under "Hypothesis" should be adopted in
>>bogofilter.
>
> Is it correct to assume, that this would come with virtually
> no cost, since the more complicated calculation is not done
> very often in each run of bogofilter?

I think that's safe to assume.

-- 
Matthias Andree