Filters that Fight Back

[Boris 'pi' Piwinger]

Matthias Andree <matthias.andree at gmx.de> wrote:

>I don't think so. As Paul Graham suggests: How many ham mails you're
>receiving contain
>
>B, E, K, N, O, P, R, U as "words"?
>
>If we took these into account, spammers breaking up words would be doing
>us a favour, because they'd deliver 8 spammy tokens (rather than two).

Could be nice. If someone has a test version, I'd be willing
to run some tests.

pi

PS: To my very surprise nobody complained that Paul's text
is unreadable due to the line lenght>:->