X-Spam-Status (was Re: New Option - '-u' for update)

[Eric Seppanen]

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 03:04:38PM -0400, Ben Rosengart wrote:
> The SpamAssassin team should have picked a less generic name for
> their header.  Let's not repeat their mistake.  A well-behaved
> program working in a shared namespace (in this case, email headers)
> should claim a previously-unused piece of the namespace for itself
> and stay within that piece.  So bogofilter should use "X-Bogo" or
> something similar, and any headers it adds should start with that.

Wouldn't be too hard to have a config-file command to allow a user to 
change the string.  This is not an argument for or against X-Spam-Status; 
just a solution in case people disagree what the header should be.

For summay digest subscription: bogofilter-digest-subscribe at aotto.com