[PATCH] bogoutil options
David Relson
relson at osagesoftware.com
Sun Dec 26 14:17:45 CET 2004
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 13:26:13 +0300
Evgeny Kotsuba wrote:
> Hi,
...[snip]...
> What is
>
> X:\>bogoutil.exe -v
> bogoutil: Exactly one of the -C, -d, -f, -F, -P, -l, -R or -w flags must
> be present.
> But from Usage string it follows that we can use "bogoutil.exe -v"
>
> X:\>bogoutil.exe -m
> X:\bogoutil.exe: option requires an argument -- m
> Option -m requires an argument.
>
> There is no "m" in usage string and there is no argument to "m" in
> online help
>
> May be there are also some other inaccuracies in BogoUtil -h
>
> SY,
> EK
Hi Evgeny,
As you can tell, there was a major reworking of options for bogoutil
with lots of long options being added and several single letter options
changed to long options. In doing that, I missed the usage message and
the required option for -m.
Attached is a patch which is guaranteed to be an improvement, though
there may still be a mistake or two.
Regards,
David
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch.bogoutil.0933.txt
URL: <https://www.bogofilter.org/pipermail/bogofilter-dev/attachments/20041226/e244eb73/attachment.txt>
More information about the bogofilter-dev
mailing list