[PATCH] bogoutil options

David Relson relson at osagesoftware.com
Sun Dec 26 14:17:45 CET 2004


On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 13:26:13 +0300
Evgeny Kotsuba wrote:

> Hi,

...[snip]...

> What is
> 
> X:\>bogoutil.exe -v
> bogoutil: Exactly one of the -C, -d, -f, -F, -P, -l, -R or -w flags must 
> be present.
> But from Usage string it follows that  we can use "bogoutil.exe -v"
> 
> X:\>bogoutil.exe -m
> X:\bogoutil.exe: option requires an argument -- m
> Option -m requires an argument.
> 
> There is no "m" in usage string and there is no argument to "m" in 
> online help
> 
> May be there are also some other  inaccuracies in BogoUtil -h
> 
> SY,
> EK

Hi Evgeny,

As you can tell, there was a major reworking of options for bogoutil
with lots of long options being added and several single letter options
changed to long options.  In doing that, I missed the usage message and
the required option for -m.  

Attached is a patch which is guaranteed to be an improvement, though
there may still be a mistake or two. 

Regards,

David

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch.bogoutil.0933.txt
URL: <https://www.bogofilter.org/pipermail/bogofilter-dev/attachments/20041226/e244eb73/attachment.txt>


More information about the bogofilter-dev mailing list