[cvs] bogofilter/src xatof.c,1.1,1.2 xatoi.c,1.1,1.2 xatox.h,1.1,1.2
Greg Louis
glouis at dynamicro.on.ca
Fri Feb 28 12:32:02 CET 2003
- Previous message (by thread): [cvs] bogofilter/src xatof.c,1.1,1.2 xatoi.c,1.1,1.2 xatox.h,1.1,1.2
- Next message (by thread): [cvs] bogofilter/src xatof.c,1.1,1.2 xatoi.c,1.1,1.2 xatox.h,1.1,1.2
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On 20030227 (Thu) at 2129:52 -0500, David Relson wrote:
> Matthias,
>
> I patched the xato?.c routines so that they could accept an unmodified copy
> of bogofilter.cf.example as the config file. I specifically wanted lines
> like the following allowed:
>
> spam_cutoff = 0.90f # for graham
> spam_cutoff = 0.54f # for robinson
But why, is the question? spam_cutoff's a double; why feed it a float
value (that gets converted anyway)? (I've been wondering for months
about all those f's scattered through the code, but I've been too lazy
to rauss them systematically.) I suppose, just to be friendly to non-C
types, one could accept and ignore f in config files -- but non-C types
wouldn't expect to put f at the end of a number anyhow.
--
| G r e g L o u i s | gpg public key: finger |
| http://www.bgl.nu/~glouis | glouis at consultronics.com |
| Help free our mailboxes. Include |
| http://wecanstopspam.org in your signature. |
- Previous message (by thread): [cvs] bogofilter/src xatof.c,1.1,1.2 xatoi.c,1.1,1.2 xatox.h,1.1,1.2
- Next message (by thread): [cvs] bogofilter/src xatof.c,1.1,1.2 xatoi.c,1.1,1.2 xatox.h,1.1,1.2
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the bogofilter-dev
mailing list