[PATCH] new patch to lexer.l, ignore my previous patch

[David Relson]

At 09:38 PM 10/23/02, Allyn Fratkin wrote:
>David Relson wrote:
>
>> > two slight bugs in the patch, (fixed with this patch), a base64 block
>> > can end in two = signs (not just one, depends on data length), and that
>> > pesky CR needs to be taken into account for heterogeneous system folks.
>>
>>Your patch has been added to lexer.l and is in CVS.
>
>
>thanks, but half the patch is missing?  i made two changes to the
>BASE64 r.e. but after a cvs update only one of the changes is
>there.  bizarre.
>
>here's another patch to try to get the other change in.
>(the change is the addition of {1,2} after the = sign on line 127).

Allyn,

My apologies.  I was doing some testing and committed one of the test 
versions.  That mistake has been corrected - with CVS updated just moments ago.

David