random oddities and questions

[Graham Wilson]

On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 07:35:49AM -0400, David Relson wrote:
> At 01:52 AM 10/8/02, Eric Seppanen wrote:
> >Is there a reason we no longer print the top "interesting" words?
> >This is the single most useful debugging tool in there.  It used to
> >appear at verbose >= 1 .  Presumably the correct action is to add
> >    if (verbose) print_stats(stats);
> >after select_indicators() is called.
> 
> There's a timing issue here, i.e. where in the header do you want to
> print these statistics.  In my personal copy of bogostats, I call
> print_stats() right after printing the "X-Bogosity" message.  Don't
> forget that it _does_ print 15 lines of statistics which significantly
> adds to the number of header lines and which can be distracting.
> FWIW, my code calls it only for spam - probably ought to be an option.

why does that information go to your headers? shouldnt it do that only
in passthrough mode?

--
gram
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.bogofilter.org/pipermail/bogofilter-dev/attachments/20021008/a00b529b/attachment.sig>