flaw in spamicity calculation

[Doug Beardsley]

On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:18:28PM -0400, David Relson wrote:
> 
> When I started testing with Eric Seppanen's multi-list patch, I split out 
> that calculation so I could compare original (esr's) and new (eds's) 
> algorithms.  He called them old_examine_word() and old_examine_word().  I 
> called them compute_probability_esr() and compute_probability_eds().  I 
> needed to have them both present to resolve the different results they gave.
> 
> If we can decide on a name for the function, I'll change the code and put 
> it into the cvs repository.

I don't have a burder for a particular function name.  I just didn't
know that it had been done.  Your names are fine with me.

Doug Beardsley