Boris 'pi' Piwinger
3.14 at logic.univie.ac.at
Wed Mar 24 07:41:18 EST 2004
David Relson wrote:
>> Why don't you set both to the same. If you get an unsure or
>> a false negative, you have to deal with it either way. You
>> don't expect any ham in unsure anyway.
> Oh? No ham in unsure? That's not my expectation.
Well, Tom said something about his very uniform mail. So he
could easily do it.
> I expect both ham
> and spam and get both ham and spam. As reported at various times, I see
> a wide variation in the scores of unsure ham and unsure spam.
That of course is a different situation from what Tom
described. On the other hand you could declare all unsure to
ham and deal with those errors. But that is not your taste I
More information about the Bogofilter