TO: vs CC:
relson at osagesoftware.com
Wed Jan 14 14:55:49 EST 2004
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:27:32 -0500
"Eric Wood" <eric at interplas.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Singletary":
> > Perhaps it would be a good idea to use just two classifications:
> > FROM and TO. If the letter is going to be delivered to an address
> > (ie, in TO or CC) then it gets marked with TO:, and if it's in the
> > FROM (perhaps even Reply-to:?) then it gets marked as FROM.
> After all, there the blind copy:
> -eric wood
Dan & Eric,
BCC shouldn't be common in incoming mail. After all, the B stands for
blind :-) In my database with 100,000+ messages, "BCC" and "Bcc"
together occurred in 77 ham messages, no spam messages.
Several header fields get special tagging -- "From:", "To:", "Subject:",
"Received:", "Return-Path:", etc. All other header fields are lumped
together under the "head:" tag.
More information about the Bogofilter