Well, it happened
David Relson
relson at osagesoftware.com
Thu Mar 13 17:08:20 CET 2003
At 10:55 AM 3/13/03, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>Sick of base64 spam, I decided to upgrade my bogofilter.
>
>And it's a mess.
>
>My procmail filters are broken (I'm getting more spam than ever), and my
>evolution support is broken (I can't mark a message as spam anymore). I
>haven't looked at my mutt support yet, but it's probably broken too.
>
>How might these procmail rules need to be changed for the new semantics?
>
>:0HB
>* ? /dcs/packages/bogofilter/bin/bogofilter
>{
> :0c
> | /dcs/packages/bogofilter/bin/bogofilter -s
>
> :0
> $MAILDIR/bogofilter
>}
>
>:0EHBc
>| /dcs/packages/bogofilter/bin/bogofilter -n
>
>
>My evolution filters use bogofilter -S -l, bogofilter -N and bogofilter
>-u. How much of this should I expect to need to change?
Hi Dan,
Sorry to hear you're having troubles.
The '-s' and '-n' options have not changed, so the procmail rules should be
fine.
The '-S' and '-N' options have become "unregister only" so the evolution
filters will need updating. "-S" used to mean "move from ham to spam"
which is now stated as "-Ns" meaning "unregister from ham ('-N')" and
"register as spam ('-s')". Similarly "-N" used to bee "move from spam to
ham" and is nos "-Sn" meaning "unregister from spam ('-S')" and "register
as ham ('-n')".
So in your evolution filters two option letters will become four, i.e.
replace -S by -Ns and replace -N by -Sn. (Note: option letters can be
joined or separated, i.e. "-Ns" can equally well be written as "-N -s".
David
More information about the Bogofilter
mailing list