several bugs/glitches/typos/questions
David Relson
relson at osagesoftware.com
Thu Mar 6 21:00:29 CET 2003
At 01:48 PM 3/6/03, W M Brelsford wrote:
>A few things I've noticed lately (using 0.11.1.1):
>
>1. bogoutil -m doesn't work, e.g. "bogoutil -c3 -m file.db" does
> not change file.db.
>
>2. bogoutil -n doesn't combine tokens, e.g. "bogoutil -n -d file.db"
> yields multiple identical lines like "c??067???? 1 20030222".
> (Would they be combined with "-m"?)
>
>3. In the bogoutil manpage:
> "The \fB-x flags sets debugging flags.\fR"
> should probably be
> "The \fB-x flags\fR option sets debugging flags."
>
>4. bogofilter -vv seems to produce no histogram if spamicity is 0.
> Is that intended? Also, -vvvv seems to produce the same
> output as -vvv.
>
>5. In the bogofilter manpage:
> a. "undoes" should be "to undo" in "The -S option tells
> bogofilter undoes a prior registration".
> b. Why is the classification run output description inside
> the "-o" section?
> c. -u is described twice.
>
>None of these are critical, but thought I'd pass along my list..
Bill,
Lists are appreciated. They lead to a better program.
I'm taking a look at #1 and #2 and have already found a flaw that explains
#1 & #2. I'll update CVS in a while.
I'l make the suggested documentation changes for #3 and #5a. #5b looks
like a heading has gotten lost. For #5c, I'll have to think where the
right place for the description is.
#4 - Those verbosity levels have only been defined for 1, 2, and
3. Anything above 3 is treated as 3.
More information about the Bogofilter
mailing list