Anybody seen this?

[Eric Seppanen]

On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:03:09PM -0400, Ben Rosengart wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 04:02:43PM -0500, Eric Seppanen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 04:50:36PM -0400, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> > > It's a explanation of what the original Paul Graham paper got wrong:
> > > http://radio.weblogs.com/0101454/stories/2002/09/16/spamDetection.html
> > 
> > Note that there are two algorithms in bogofilter, and this paper deals 
> > with only the second.
> 
> I don't believe that is correct.  The paper addresses per-word
> spamicity under the "Further Improvement" headings.

Yes, you're right.  Interesting.

For summay digest subscription: bogofilter-digest-subscribe at aotto.com