0.93 and 1.0
matthias.andree at gmx.de
Fri Oct 8 20:29:11 EDT 2004
David Relson <relson at osagesoftware.com> writes:
> On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 02:00:48 +0200
> Matthias Andree wrote:
>> Observing the whole issue a bit broader, word.[ch] pretty much
>> resembles the C++ standard library's "string" class. Using that would
>> save us a lot of hassle, but I'd suggest that C++ is a post-1.0 issue.
> Speaking of 1.0, what are your thoughts on my proposal to promote the
> TXN code to HEAD and release 0.93?
I'd shared your thoughts but hadn't gotten around to fix up the
documentation and add the missing "auto-resize" code that will kick in
when bogoutil -d runs out of lock table entries. This is still manual.
Once these two issues are resolved, we can go 0.93 - and if we have the
time, let's audit everything so we're no longer using str* stuff on word
Encrypted mail welcome: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 (PGP/MIME preferred)
More information about the Bogofilter-dev