0.93 and 1.0 [was: segfault on rfc2047-like subject]
relson at osagesoftware.com
Fri Oct 8 20:19:10 EDT 2004
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 02:00:48 +0200
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Observing the whole issue a bit broader, word.[ch] pretty much
> resembles the C++ standard library's "string" class. Using that would
> save us a lot of hassle, but I'd suggest that C++ is a post-1.0 issue.
Speaking of 1.0, what are your thoughts on my proposal to promote the
TXN code to HEAD and release 0.93?
More information about the Bogofilter-dev